All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the Lymphoma Coalition.

The Lymphoma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Lymphoma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Lymphoma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Lymphoma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Lymphoma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2016-11-16T15:27:13.000Z

Does interim fluorodeoxyglucose-PET have predictive value?

Nov 16, 2016
Share:

Bookmark this article

Hugo Adams and Thomas Kwee, based in the Netherlands, recently wrote a correspondence in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Oct 2016, in response to an article by Press et al. who presented the results of a US intergroup study that used interim FDG-PET imaging to decide whether or not to keep stage III-IV HL patients on ABVD or switch them to eBEACOPP.

Highlights:

  • 358 patients enrolled, 336 evaluable
  • PET scan after two ABVD cycles
  • Deauville score 1–3 = pts received 4 more cycles ABVD
  • Deauville score 4–5 = pts switched to 6 cycles eBEACOPP
  • 82% pts were PET-negative so stayed on ABVD, 18% were PET-positive and were switched to eBEACOPP
  • 2-year PFS estimate: PET-neg = 82%, PET-pos = 64%

One of the main issues with the study that Adams & Kwee present is that no control arm was used to compare against standard ABVD treatment. Furthermore, Adams & Kwee detailed a meta-analysis that did not support Press et al.’s claim that positive interim FDG-PET is associated with very poor prognosis. Additionally, Adams & Kwee state that follow-up FDG-PET has a high false-positive rate, but the authors did not report the histopathological confirmation of disease, and current PET techniques have poor resolution resulting in the possibility that small lymphocytic deposits may be missed. Adam & Kwee also state that using a more intense treatment option is only justified in cases where there is a proven significant difference in PFS and OS, which was not demonstrated in the paper. In conclusion, Adams & Kwee state that in patients with advanced HL, interim FDG-PET may not be as useful in improving outcomes as Press et al.suggest, and more work is needed to confirm any potential.

  1. Press O.W. et al. US intergroup trial of response-adapted therapy for stage III to IV Hodgkin lymphoma using early interim fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography imaging: Southwest Oncology Group S0816. J Clin Oncol. Jun 2016 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.1119.
  2. Adams H.J. & Kwee T.C. Predictive Value of Interim [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Is Not Well Established. J Clin Oncol. Oct 2016. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1494.

Understanding your specialty helps us to deliver the most relevant and engaging content.

Please spare a moment to share yours.

Please select or type your specialty

  Thank you

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to lymphoma & CLL delivered to your inbox